On the back of a rotten dream and a few following unsettled nights, I dragged just about every scriptural reference book I own out, blew off the dust, and began scratching out the following. It’s heavy but it’s worth the toil. I think.
The Catholic doctrine of Purgatory has always been a scandal to the tidy-minded. It irritates Protestants for its lack of explicit chapter-and-verse endorsement; it embarrasses rationalists for daring to suggest post-mortem correction; and it unsettles even some Catholics, who’d prefer their salvation neatly packaged – Amazon Prime for the soul. Yet like all enduring ideas, it lingers because it speaks to something intuitively human: that we’re never quite finished, never quite clean, at the moment death lays its claim.
Long before Trent, long before Luther’s hammer and Augustine’s restless heart, the Jews of the Second Temple period were already pondering the fate of their beloved dead. 2 Maccabees 12:43–46 is the great quarry here: Judas Maccabeus, that hammer of the Seleucids, gathers up fallen comrades who have died clutching pagan amulets, prays for them, and offers sacrifice ‘that they might be delivered from their sin.’
To Catholics, this is revelation itself – a biblical imprimatur for prayers beyond the grave. To Protestants, it’s a curiosity locked in the Apocrypha, a kind of spiritual appendix: occasionally useful, but hardly canonical. Yet the point remains – at least some Jews thought death wasn’t the end of God’s mercy. Other Jews disagreed: the Sadducees rejected afterlife talk altogether, preferring their Temple and their power. Their denial sounds oddly modern, as if Purgatory were not so much theology but a referendum on whether one believes the soul survives at all.
And Rabbinic Judaism? It spoke of Gehinnom, a fiery pit, not eternal but corrective, where souls stayed up to twelve months before release. The Kaddish prayer arose not as a plea for purification but as praise to God – yet somehow, it too became a way of assisting the departed. Here’s the irony: though Judaism never canonised 2 Maccabees, it still breathed in the same imaginative air of temporary fire, unfinished souls, and prayer bridging the living and the dead.
The Apostle Paul, architect of so much theological scaffolding, drops a cryptic line in 1 Corinthians 3:15: the believer may be ‘saved, yet so as through fire.’
For Protestants, this is about works, not souls – our deeds tested, our rewards lost, but we ourselves whisked safely home. For Catholics, however, the metaphor smoulders with something more: a purifying flame licking away sin’s residue, echoing the refiner’s fire of Malachi.
The Fathers agreed with Rome more than with Geneva. Origen imagined fire that cleanses transgressions; Augustine saw some Christians ‘saved by fire’ after worldly attachments are burnt away; even Chrysostom hinted at flames consuming the dross of a life. I could dismiss them all as over-allegorising Alexandrians and rhetoricians – but then I’d have to dismiss almost all of Christian exegesis before the Reformation.
Jesus himself seems to leave a door ajar. In Matthew 12:32, he declares that blasphemy against the Holy Spirit won’t be forgiven ‘in this age or the age to come.’ Protestants insist this is a Semitic way of saying ‘never.’ Catholics, ever hopeful, detect a clue: if one sin’s never forgiven, perhaps others are, in that mysterious ‘age to come.’
Augustine read the line as final impenitence – an existential closing of the heart to God. Aquinas, more scholastic, parsed it into degrees of malice: sins against knowledge, sins against grace, sins against repentance. Both agreed the Spirit’s blasphemy shuts the gate forever, but the very phrase ‘in this age or the next’ remains tantalisingly open-ended.
Elsewhere, the hints keep multiplying. In Matthew 5:25–26, the debtor is cast into prison until he pays ‘the last penny.’ Surely a metaphor for human reconciliation, say Protestants; surely an image of temporal punishment, say Catholics.
And what of Luke 16, the parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus? The rich man, tormented, begs for water across the ‘great chasm.’ Catholic theologians once tried to place this scene within a temporary schema of Sheol; but the parable itself suggests permanence. The Fathers – Tertullian, Augustine – saw final judgment here, not purgation. And yet, the imagery of divided realms echoes 1 Enoch and 4 Ezra, texts where post-death states are multiple, stratified, and not always eternal. Again, ambiguity persists like smoke from a hidden fire.
Step aside from proof-texts, and the doctrine gains a different kind of plausibility. Plato, in the Gorgias, imagined souls judged, some punished temporarily, others eternally. Dante, centuries later, would climb Mount Purgatory, his terraces filled not with despair but with hope – sinners purging their loves, singing hymns, longing for ascent.
Even psychology whispers of it: how many of us die ‘unfinished,’ still entangled in resentment, fear, or petty pride? If heaven’s pure love, then some solvent must dissolve these crusted residues. Purgatory’s less a furnace than a divine laundrette: garments made ready for the wedding feast.
And existentially, the idea reassures: justice is real, but so is mercy. Hell exists, but not all are consigned to it. Heaven awaits, but without cheap grace. The middle way, though messy, satisfies the demands of both conscience and compassion.
Ultimately, the gulf between Catholic and Protestant here isn’t just about exegesis but epistemology.
Catholics: Scripture interpreted through Tradition and Fathers = Purgatory, a doctrine unfolding from seeds already planted. Protestants: Sola scriptura = no explicit text, therefore no doctrine. Salvation is finished at death; prayers for the dead are superstitious at best, blasphemous at worst.
Neither side can prove the other wrong in purely rational terms. It’s less a matter of syllogism than of vision: whether one sees history, tradition, and communal instinct as evidence of divine guidance, or as accretions obscuring a simpler gospel.
Purgatory, like the fire it imagines, both illuminates and unsettles. It offers mercy without trivialising sin, hope without erasing justice. It’s not named in Scripture, yet it haunts its margins: in the prayers of Judas, the warnings of Jesus, the metaphors of Paul. Protestants may banish it with the broom of sola scriptura, but like smoke, it drifts back under the door, borne on the longings of the living for their dead.
As Augustine sighed: “Lord, burn me here, and spare me there.” As Dante sang: “For those who wait in fire, the blessed hope is sure.” And as Wilde himself might have quipped, “One must have a heart of stone not to believe in Purgatory – for what else could account for the English Sunday?”
If you feel edified or just plain confused, console yourself and Buy Me a Coffee
Wording 